🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to scrub African American heritage and legacy from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the past when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.